Stolen from various peoples
Mar. 9th, 2005 05:14 pmI turned on anonymous posting, but now I actually want you to use it. I want you to post anything that you want.
Anything.
A story, a secret, a confession, a fear, a love - anything. Be sure to post anonymously and honestly. Post twice if you'd like.
Then, put this in your LJ to see what your friends (and perhaps others who you don't even realize read your LJ) have to say.
Anything.
A story, a secret, a confession, a fear, a love - anything. Be sure to post anonymously and honestly. Post twice if you'd like.
Then, put this in your LJ to see what your friends (and perhaps others who you don't even realize read your LJ) have to say.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-09 10:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-09 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-09 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-09 10:48 pm (UTC)repeat
Date: 2005-03-10 12:33 am (UTC)Re: repeat
Date: 2005-03-10 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:20 pm (UTC)Cheeble: This handy-dandy all-purpose word was coined by my son and is his, Pat. Pend., © and all like that there, Hands Off! It can be used (with proper permission) as a noun or verb, but the most commonly agreed-upon definition is that it is the cry of the enraged bull hamster. Now you know
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-09 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:22 pm (UTC)Fear is one HELL of a motivator, isn't it? I dunno, the drama I have seen all seems to have fear as the induction element.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 07:14 pm (UTC)Paradoxically, you keep your circle of actual friends closeknit and closed.
Other than that, you are an interesting and lovable person.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 07:30 pm (UTC)I don't like Spam. Do you mean posting quizzes and memes and stuff? I post them when I see a bunch of my friends doing them, and think, "ooh, I'll try that."
I fully admit I love attention. I don't see that as a failing. My rants on NFP and TotC are more about the end result of huge buildup of irritation with other people who annoy the fuck out of me, and not about wanting attention for myself. I don't suffer fools gladly.
A large part of the neediness, though you may not know me well enough to know this, was the result of huge amounts of emotional damage being inflicted on me by the dishonesty and neglect of
My circle of friends is rather large, actually, and not so much close-knit as it is sorta incestuous...all my friends know one another somehow. And there are always new people being added on. It's by no means closed. But I am selective about who I choose to bring in on a close level.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 10:06 pm (UTC)You shouldn't let one bad apple, or bad actions of an otherwise almost okay apple, change your views on your own worth. Nor on how other people feel about you. that is giving a prick too much power over you.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 10:17 pm (UTC)just going off of what you wrote.
Date: 2005-03-11 10:22 pm (UTC)Re: just going off of what you wrote.
Date: 2005-03-11 10:25 pm (UTC)Re: just going off of what you wrote.
Date: 2005-03-11 10:29 pm (UTC)Are they the same thing to you?
If not, why conflate them in your response?
Re: just going off of what you wrote.
Date: 2005-03-11 10:33 pm (UTC)apologies.
Date: 2005-03-11 10:37 pm (UTC)Re: just going off of what you wrote.
Are they the same thing to you?
If not, why conflate them in your response?
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 09:34 pm (UTC)You've proudly proclaimed to be in a coven several times, I'd assumed (my apologies if I am wrong) that you could or did some variant of the above (mind you I tend to think everyone is capable of doing this, even if only subconsciously).
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 09:42 pm (UTC)It's also easier to make incorrect judgments about people when you only see their LJ face. That face is almost always more drama-prone and frequently more frivolous than the person's real character. LJ can also be a lot more cliquish than real life.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 09:54 pm (UTC)Mind you, I like comparing my RL friends with what they project online... Most people show more than they think they are...
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 10:13 pm (UTC)this is a typical cusp issue on the E vs I portion of the MBTI. Many externally judged E's see themselves as I's.
I would go so far as to say that almst no one who actually posts anything about themselves on LJ without clamping down like a vise on their filters, can be considered an I in MBTI.
YMMV.
Also, why are either of the two points you bring up something that warrants an otherwise regarding being interesting and lovable?
Are you suggesting that needing/liking/wanting attention, yet having a tight knit circle of friends, would neccesarily make someone uninteresting or unlovable?
Or are you suggesting that those two points/issues are merely SUFFICIENT to being unlovable and uninteresting?
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 10:41 pm (UTC)With regards to the comment about tight knit ("incestuous" as she put it) circles of friends, I've most often encountered them in groups of adults that were outsiders as children and teens. From within those samples, the one that resonates with her (in my mind's eye at least) is a person that really likes attention. This ties in with the knowledge that a fair portion of the people that really like attention as adults were starved for it as kids.
Since, I think/feel/intuit/guess that she's come from a said background and that she's made tremenduous progress in those areas, I said that she actually is loveable and interesting. Unfortunately, much as I am loathe to admit it, my logic and communication skills aren't my forte, being fuzzy on the one hand and decidely awkward in the latter. Thus it is that I didn't convey my meaning properly. :/
========
Bottom line, I'm not trying to be rude or insulting.
I was piqued with interest by an interesting meme that I'd never run across in my LJ forays, accessed opinions that I'd formulated and mentally saved of her several months ago and submitted my view of her to see how she'd react (and to see how accurate I was).
This will be my last comment on this matter.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-13 11:49 pm (UTC)