I won't do the things I was thinking about, or at least not the first things . . . That's just too bitchy and catty. That's what snark communities are for.
I mean, I'd really rather not be bitchy and catty about people indirectly.
personally, i think there should be a scale and when someone does something nice, or you feel good about them, they get a plus for the day. and a minus for people who piss you off. and they accumulate over time to give you an average impression of people.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 03:09 pm (UTC)You could start one at the bottom of your Bio using lj markup... It'd look like the real thing!
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 03:11 pm (UTC)Oooh...I could put people like John Ashcroft on there, and that bitch who jumped on my finger on the bouncy castle when I was a kid and sprained it!
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 03:26 pm (UTC)giggling
Date: 2005-07-15 03:29 pm (UTC)You'll be amused.
Too bad I don't have time to figure out how to unindent.
Re: giggling
Date: 2005-07-15 04:23 pm (UTC)Then again, I might mean it to be so . . .
Re: giggling
Date: 2005-07-15 04:29 pm (UTC)Re: giggling
Date: 2005-07-15 04:31 pm (UTC)I won't do the things I was thinking about, or at least not the first things . . .
That's just too bitchy and catty.
That's what snark communities are for.
I mean, I'd really rather not be bitchy and catty about people indirectly.
Re: giggling
Date: 2005-07-15 04:33 pm (UTC)Re: giggling
Date: 2005-07-15 04:40 pm (UTC)Re: giggling
Date: 2005-07-15 04:42 pm (UTC)Re: giggling
Date: 2005-07-15 04:50 pm (UTC)Re: giggling
Date: 2005-07-15 04:56 pm (UTC)And potential for community service
Date: 2005-07-15 04:34 pm (UTC)Re: And potential for community service
Date: 2005-07-15 04:40 pm (UTC)Re: And potential for community service
Date: 2005-07-15 04:43 pm (UTC)Re: And potential for community service
Date: 2005-07-15 04:44 pm (UTC)in profile pages they only link to the user's profile page, and no lj user icon . . .
Not to be my usual pedantic self . . .
although that is keeping me out of major f'ing trouble.
oh, the potentials for abuse . . .
Date: 2005-07-15 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 03:27 pm (UTC)but then, that's the statophile in me.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 03:57 pm (UTC)Oh, yes, I could certainly get into that.
Ok, I really don't have too many folks who'd be on it. Um, I can't even think of a handful - but it would be a cool thing to have.