A geek question
Feb. 13th, 2008 11:48 amI was reminded today that I want to start getting into Doctor Who. Granted, it was the intriguing suggestion of Jack Harkness/Doctor slash fic that reminded me of that fact, but that's beside the point. Ahem.
My entire experience of Doctor Who includes the following:
1. Watching one episode from last season
2. Seeing the Dalek Song video
3. Seeing various Doctor scarves and knit daleks
4. Hearing the KLF song, "Doctorin' the TARDIS"
Now, there is a LOT of Doctor Who out there. I'm unsure how the series works. Do I have to start at the beginning to appreciate it? That is, are the episodes typically part of a larger story arc (as with Babylon 5), or do they typically stand alone (as with Law and Order), or is it a mixture of both, where there are some episodes that stand alone but there is also an important story arc that you can't get by watching random episodes (as with The X-Files)?
The practical upshot of that question is, if I want to get into the show, should I go to the library and see about renting the first season (or borrow it from someone), or should I just watch the next episode that's on TV and pick up reruns or whatever as I go along? Are there movies I need to watch? Are there swaths of the show that I should just ignore as sucky or irrelevant? Are there things I MUST NOT MISS?
Tell me, O Geektastic Friends List!
My entire experience of Doctor Who includes the following:
1. Watching one episode from last season
2. Seeing the Dalek Song video
3. Seeing various Doctor scarves and knit daleks
4. Hearing the KLF song, "Doctorin' the TARDIS"
Now, there is a LOT of Doctor Who out there. I'm unsure how the series works. Do I have to start at the beginning to appreciate it? That is, are the episodes typically part of a larger story arc (as with Babylon 5), or do they typically stand alone (as with Law and Order), or is it a mixture of both, where there are some episodes that stand alone but there is also an important story arc that you can't get by watching random episodes (as with The X-Files)?
The practical upshot of that question is, if I want to get into the show, should I go to the library and see about renting the first season (or borrow it from someone), or should I just watch the next episode that's on TV and pick up reruns or whatever as I go along? Are there movies I need to watch? Are there swaths of the show that I should just ignore as sucky or irrelevant? Are there things I MUST NOT MISS?
Tell me, O Geektastic Friends List!
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 05:06 pm (UTC)Exposure to previous incarnations is helpful to a point as he does meet the same people again from time to time.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 05:13 pm (UTC)After that you may want to take a peek at the wikipedia Dr. Who entry. It will give you a history of the original series, storylines and an overview of all the previous doctors.
The old Dr. Who series usually used short 'serial' style stories: one story over 3-4 episodes. These stories are being released individually on DVD, usually with gobs of extras. They're a little pricey but would be good Netflix grabs.
I found the old stories easy to jump into even if you don't quite know who all the characters are.
Have fun!
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 05:30 pm (UTC)http://www.amazon.com/A-Top-Ten-quot-Classic-quot-Doctor-Who-listing/lm/R349ZY4FX5YTPI/ref=cm_lm_byauthor_title_full
After that, I think you'd be good-to-go with just starting from the first Christopher Eccelston episode (i.e., the first season of the new series) and watching 'em all in sequence from there.
uhm...
Date: 2008-02-13 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 06:14 pm (UTC)I'm now dreaming of a Dr. Seuss Doctor Who series for the kids of the fans of the series. I've always suspected "The Doctor's" first name was Horton. :-)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-14 10:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 09:13 pm (UTC)One up side of all of the sheer amount of history is that the old stuff is never strictly followed. Half the time it's discarded when they want to use part of an old idea in a new episode - just for instance, Daleks were initially powered by static electricity and couldn't leave the metal floors of their city. That didn't stay true very long. It's somewhat like comic book continuity that way. It's certainly nothing like as tightly plotted as B5.
There are movies, but you'll want to avoid them. They were mediocre retellings of episodes of the show, but with the characters and universe all changed. They're not just irrelevent, they actively contradict the TV show.
I'd agree with the top 10 list
The new seasons have a gentle story arc each time - season 1 B5 might be a good comparison, where there are recurring minor characters and events that turn out to be more significant than they'd appear at first glance, but most of the stories are standalone or at worst two-parters. You'll have to accept that you'll be missing a lot of throwaway references they put in for us long-time watchers, but there's no way around that without spending a lot of time catching up.
You should be warned that most people imprint on the first Doctor they watch as their favorite, and that this produces stupid arguments.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 10:23 pm (UTC)Torchwood -- your mileage may vary. It could be written better. It's kitchy. But it can grow on you.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 10:38 pm (UTC)As a series it is predicated on the fact that the actor playing the main character will change (and there is a loose sci-fi reason for this, as "time lords cheat death, by regenerating their bodies after great injury". There was originally supposed to be some sort of limit to this, but that got tossed out the window years ago)
The second fact it was predicated on was that the BBC who makes the shows, has typically had much lower production costs than comparable US shows, so so of the effects/costumes/props are fairly flimsy (Blakes 7 is much more oblivious in this regard) :-) But it's why the Dr's time capsule is stuck looking like an early 60's Police Call box...
The various Dr's over the years have had differing personalities, although most tend to be somewhat whimsical in their approach to danger/tense situations.
The series was pulled from the air for a few years in the 90's and was brought back in 2005. Capt Jack, was spun off to make Torchwood from that first renewed season, and has had a couple of cross over episodes from the latest season on air here.
Briony and I have all three seasons of the newer Dr Who on DVD, and the first released season of Torchwood. (Although we just lent it out to some friends we got hooked, and we spent an evening getting Erik and Dee Cee hooked on Torchwood as well.) I'm thinking if B is up for it maybe well have people over for a Dr Who marathon since this is a long weekend (although I know some people will be at Boskone)...
no subject
Date: 2008-02-14 02:09 am (UTC)Really? I can't think of anything that contradicted the regeneration limit, unless you're thinking of the mystery faces in The Brain of Morbius. I'm sure they'll find a way to throw it out if it ever becomes inconvenient, but for now I think it's still canon.
The limit was only established in, what, The Deadly Assassin anyway, a long time after the first regeneration.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-14 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-14 04:57 am (UTC)Anyway. They've got three Doctors left after Tennant, so if the show is still doing well at that point I'm sure they'll come up with something.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-15 01:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 11:18 pm (UTC)