badseed1980: (mask)
[personal profile] badseed1980
I just watched the recent Sherlock Holmes movie, having received it as my first Netflix rental. Now, my familiarity with the series is limited to a few condensed-and-cleaned-up-for-kids stories I read when I was a young'un, and some general knowledge of the characters gleaned from other pieces of culture that were influenced by the stories (House, for example). In other words, I was not a knowledgeable reader who'd know where they went wrong, plot-wise or otherwise. With that disclaimer out of the way, I enjoyed the hell out of the movie. Irene Adler annoyed me a little, mostly for the way she talked. Everything else was pretty much awesome. And I thought Robert Downey Jr. was incredibly hot during the boxing match scene, for some reason. Um. Anyway.

I'm also reading Shadows Over Baker Street, an anthology of short stories involving the juxtaposition of Sherlock Holmes and the creations of H.P. Lovecraft. I decided to get it after reading one of the stories in it, Neil Gaiman's Hugo winner "A Study in Emerald," which is phenomenal, and which I probably would have better understood if I'd known more about the original stories when I read it. By now, I've read some stuff about the story that explains the twist I didn't get.

What all this boils down to, of course, is that I am going to have to read the actual Holmes stories. Fortunately, [livejournal.com profile] leenah was kind enough to send me a number of links to the stories where they're available in their entirety online. I'm eager to dive in. But now, I will NOT sit up and get started on "A Study in Scarlet." I will get my ass to bed, because that is where it belongs right now.

Date: 2010-09-24 01:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pir.livejournal.com
http://books.google.com/books?id=buc0AAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

Date: 2010-09-24 10:15 am (UTC)

Date: 2010-09-24 01:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] woodwardiocom.livejournal.com
Oh, you're in for a treat!

(One caveat: Doyle had a desperate desire to write Westerns instead of mysteries, so a couple of the novels have great big flashbacks about Mormons in the American West. Honestly, I tend to skip those outright.)

Date: 2010-09-24 10:15 am (UTC)

Date: 2010-09-24 03:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leenah.livejournal.com
or, as the newest sherlock says "the game is on!" yeah, i've got that too, you want, i'll point. :) or you can wait for it to show up on masterpiece theater in october, it's only three episodes.

the whole bit about the mormons in Study in Scarlet is just *weird*, but it's a good story underneath all that cruft. and it's pretty much necessary to fully understand the newest sherlock holmes - the first episode is "A Study in Pink" ----- in case you care. :) ok, fine, you don't NEED study in scarlet to understand it, but it makes it so much more fun. and it's by moffat and gatiss, that's worth checking out, no?

Date: 2010-09-24 10:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badseed1980.livejournal.com
That's right, I'd forgotten that was out.

Date: 2010-09-24 12:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paigemom.livejournal.com
I liked the acting and the snappy dialogue but thought the plot was rather thin.

And yeah, he was hawt :)

Date: 2010-09-24 12:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badseed1980.livejournal.com
Agreed on all counts. I think I actually said, "Oh no, not another Masonic conspiracy-type thing." Maybe if they do a sequel focusing on Moriarty, that will be better.

Profile

badseed1980: (Default)
badseed1980

November 2021

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 27th, 2026 06:05 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios