I guess I will NOT be attending the B&D ball. Higher priorities have gotten in the way. Ah well, truth be told I'll probably enjoy myself just as much, if not more so. :)
just because we would like to see her half naked does not mean that there are not others that would also wish to see her so. I am sure this was not an easy choice for which group of people got to see her bodacious ta-ta's with just pasties on them. we should be happy to know that we were at least in the running.
Whoa now, this has nothing to do with me wearing pasties or showing off my ta-tas! This is actually a serious commitment, not a date or anything. But I will certainly be out there sometime soon.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-15 09:07 am (UTC)now now
Date: 2004-04-15 09:11 am (UTC)Re: now now
Date: 2004-04-15 09:16 am (UTC)On the other hand, Kat and Laura in the same place may well just be to much beauty for one building to hold.
Re: now now
Date: 2004-04-15 09:19 am (UTC)Re: now now
Date: 2004-04-15 09:17 am (UTC)Re: now now
Date: 2004-04-15 09:20 am (UTC)those could be sky-clad, I am assuming again tho.
Re: now now
Date: 2004-04-15 09:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-15 09:16 am (UTC)darn
Date: 2004-04-15 09:08 am (UTC)Re: darn
Date: 2004-04-15 09:14 am (UTC)just because you will not be at the B&D ball does not mean that you should pass up any shopping trips associated with others attending it.
Re: darn
Date: 2004-04-15 09:16 am (UTC)Re: darn
Date: 2004-04-15 11:43 am (UTC)Re: darn
Date: 2004-04-15 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-15 09:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-15 09:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-15 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-15 12:19 pm (UTC)