THIS IS SO AWESOME, I ALMOST CRIED. :D
Nov. 9th, 2010 09:27 amFrom the UK College of Arms' newsletter:

And in case the motto isn't clear, it reads "Noli timere messorem."
Illustrated left are the Armorial Bearings granted to Sir Terence David John PRATCHETT of Broad Chalke, Wiltshire, Knight, OBE by Letters Patent of Garter and Clarenceux Kings of Arms dated 28 April 2010.
The Arms are blazoned: Sable an ankh between four Roundels in saltire each issuing Argent.
The Crest is Upon a Helm with a Wreath Argent and Sable On Water Barry wavy Sable Argent and Sable an Owl affronty wings displayed and inverted Or supporting thereby two closed Books erect Gules.
And in case the motto isn't clear, it reads "Noli timere messorem."
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:02 pm (UTC)Too costly, I think.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:45 pm (UTC)And even the SCA requires major research within their own heraldric archives when granting arms.
Maybe I'll consider it a retirement gift to myself, down the line.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 04:00 pm (UTC)We cannot prove that descent on the pond jump.
However, we can trace back to our first ancestor on this shore, and i would love to reclaim even a portion of the possible family arms, to have and pass on to my children.
And, for those interested:
argent, a cross fleury sable; on a canton gules, a wolfhound's head proper, in teeth a marigold or
the crest is harder to describe, as I don't know how to describe the rolled up circlet of three colors on which it rested, but it was a wolfhound's head proper, in teeth a marigold or.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 04:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 04:06 pm (UTC)I am who I am, not because of being able to trace back to the 1600's, I know that.
But i like knowing I can, for me.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 11:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 09:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 03:30 pm (UTC)In many things i have read about the SCA, it reminds people - it's a game.
To an outsider - taking on a role, and playing a game, without dice and books and character sheets, is LARPing.
Just because the SCA looks down it's collective nose at LARPers (in true geek hierarchical fashion), doesn't make it any less of a live action role playing game.
Mind you, I consider Civil War re-enactors LARPers, too.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 03:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 03:43 pm (UTC)I won't/can't be knighted like Sir Terry, but I can hold arms.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-15 07:36 pm (UTC)There is a common misunderstanding among USers that *families* had grants of arms. More accurately, one individual family holds the grant of arms at any time, and they are inherited like titles and real property. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coat_of_arms#Traditions_and_usage (I believe that, like titles, not all arms are hereditary.) However, unless you are the current arms holder, it is not appropriate to use those arms. (Even the members of the British Royal Family have to be granted their own arms, though they are usually a differenced version of the Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_coat_of_arms_of_the_United_Kingdom#Royal_Family)
It's kinda like real property. Unless it's your house, you're legally a guest even if you are related--no matter how long it's been in the family.
Make sense?
no subject
Date: 2011-07-15 07:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 05:28 pm (UTC)Don't fear the reaper, indeed. That's too wonderful for words.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 09:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 12:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 01:05 pm (UTC)